President Donald Trump shakes hands with EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt after announcing his decision for the United States to pull out of the Paris climate agreement in the Rose Garden at the White House June 1, 2017 in Washington, DC. Photo by Win McNamee Getty Images

The head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Scott Pruitt, confirmed on Monday that the Trump administration would be rolling back Obama’s Clean Power Plan initiative. The CPP was originally put in place as part of the previous administration’s pledge under the Paris Accord; the plan aimed to cut power sector emissions 32 percent by 2030, relative to 2005 levels.

The rollback of the CPP was first reported by Bloomberg News. According to the news outlet, a 43-page proposal mentioned, among other things, that the end of the CPP would be officially requested this Tuesday; the proposal argued that the “Obama administration exceeded its legal authority” by imposing the CPP.

The repeal proposal, which is now available online, doesn’t mention any alternative plan that the EPA may implement to replace the CPP in regulating CO2 emissions. In fact, the proposal will likely seek to increase support for the extraction and use of coal and other fossil fuels, according to Henrik Selin, Global Studies Professor at Boston University; “It will likely change the way in which climate change concerns are incorporated into the federal agencies’ actions,” explained Selin, to Univision Planeta.

The CPP was designed to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal power plants, as well as to promote new forms of renewable energy. Additionally, the CPP established emission standards for new power plants, which were meant to further reduce emissions. Eliminating the CPP makes it very unlikely that the U.S. will be able to fulfill its promise as part of the Paris climate agreement.


From its announcement in August 2015, the CPP has been met with opposition. In 2015, a group of 29 States and State Agencies with support from several companies and industrial organizations, brought a lawsuit challenging the CPP’s constitutionality. Last year, the Supreme Court blocked the rule from taking effect until lower courts could assess the pending lawsuits. While the litigation was pending, oil and energy companies have continuously expressed how these regulations would force them to cease operations; some have gone on to argue that the CPP is essentially a subsidy for the clean energy industries

 The repeal proposal fulfills the promise that President Trump made during his campaign, that he would eradicate Obama’s environmental legacy. Starting tomorrow, once the proposal is filed, it will have to go through an extensive public-comment period, a process which can take months. As of yet, the E.P.A. has not offered a timeline on when it hopes to have a finalized rule.

This decision to roll back the CPP is just one of the many expressions coming out of the current government that demonstrates their preference for industry over the environment. The Trump Administration has already announced that the U.S. will be withdraw from the Paris Agreement, and their budget proposals have included huge cuts to areas related to research and clean technologies.


 This article was originally published by Univision Planeta